Jump to Navigation

Columbus OH Business & Commercial Law Blog

Ohio teacher wins $171,000 through employment litigation

It is against Ohio law and federal law to discriminate against pregnant women in the workplace. This means that a woman cannot be fired because she is pregnant. When the woman works for a religious organization, however, this rule may not be so straightforward.

An Ohio woman filed an anti-discrimination lawsuit against an area archdiocese and two Catholic schools where she worked as a teacher. The lawsuit came after she was fired from her job at the schools. The lawyer for the defendants stated that the woman was fired for breach of contract; when she was hired she signed a contract agreeing to abide by the teachings of the Catholic Church. The woman’s lawyer, on the other hand, claimed that she was fired because she was an unmarried woman who became pregnant through artificial discrimination. The computer technology teacher, who is not Catholic, said that she did not know that becoming pregnant would violate her employment contract.

Study: employment litigation is at an all-time high

The United States has a national minimum wage and other federal mandates that are supposed to protect employees from being overworked and underpaid. These laws are part of the Fair Labor Standards Act. When businesses in Ohio do not adhere to these laws, an employee may be able to file a federal lawsuit.

U.S. employers are facing a real and growing threat from their employees; a recent study shows that lawsuits against employers are at a record high. The number of wage and hour claims filed by employees has risen by 10 percent in the last year and 518 percent since 1990. One professional in the area of employment litigation points the finger at lawyers who are looking to capitalize off struggling businesses. Other people believe the increase in wage and hour lawsuits indicates that some U.S. businesses may be purposefully cheating their employees out of wages and benefits in order to increase profits in this struggling economy.

Ohio trucking company sues Pilot Flying J for breach of contract

Many companies in Ohio have been hit hard by the recent economic slump. Some of them have utilized unlawful practices as a way to earn extra money. When this happens, a company may face litigation.    

Ohio Auto Delivery Inc. accused Pilot Flying J of breach of contract, fraud, and other unlawful practices in a class action lawsuit. The trucking company has been in contract with Pilot Flying J since 2004 and they claim the fraud has been happening since at least 2005. The dispute revolves around a fuel rebate program; according to the lawsuit, Pilot Flying J failed to provide promised discounts and fuel rebates.

Federal prison faces sexual harassment complaints

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is a federal agency that protects employees from workplace discrimination. Sexual harassment is a type of discrimination that may be investigated by the EEOC and often leads to employment litigation in Ohio. When employers fail to protect their employees from harassment, they may face a class-action.

Female employees at a federal prison complex have been granted class-action status by a judge. The Bureau of Prisons does not support this decision. They argued that the judge chose to believe the women’s complaints of sexual harassment despite a lack of evidence. Many of the women, on the other hand, stated that complaints to their supervisors from the Bureau of Prisons were ignored. The Justice Department endorsed the class-action decision but the Bureau of Prisons asked them to file an appeal. 

Brewing company accused of unfair competition

The business world is a competitive place, especially for startup companies. Most companies do not turn a profit in their first years of business. In order to beat out the competition and make a name for themselves, new companies in Ohio must be extremely strategic when it comes to branding. If they choose a logo that is too similar to their competition, they may face business litigation.

West Sixth Brewing Co. has come under fire for the logo they have used on products sold in Ohio and one other state. Since April 2012, the brewing company has sold beer and ale with a number 6 on the label. Also included in the sign is a “dingbat” star and a circle around the number. Another brewing company, Magic Hat uses a #9 logo that also includes a swirling, circular design and a “dingbat” star. The company alleges that they have used this logo since 1995. 

Ohio school district sued for breach of contract

When two or more people, businesses or organizations sign a contract in Ohio, they are making a legal agreement. This means they must follow through on the deal. When one or both sides fails to uphold their end of the bargain, contract disputes often ensue. When this happens, either party may seek litigation.

The Licking County Education Service Center in Ohio is suing the Licking Heights school district for breach of contract. They claim that the school district owes them money for services performed. According to a statement from the vice president of the ESC governing board, they have a signed contract in place in which the school district agrees to pay the amount they are billed by the ESC. The school district, on the other hand, alleges that in the past 7 years they have been overcharged by $292,000; they have filed a countersuit against the ESC.

Ohio Lottery Commission sued for wrongful termination

No one wants to lose their job because of things that are happening in their personal life. Occasionally, however, an employee may feel that they have been fired for reasons that are unrelated to their job performance. When this happens in Ohio, the fired employee may seek employment litigation.

A councilman from the city of Seven Hills Ohio is suing the Ohio Lottery Commission and several executives from the OLC for wrongful discharge. The lawsuit claims that when the man was hired by the OLC as a Labor Relations Officers he was informed that his continued employment was dependent on his ability to stay out of the news. It seems the man was unable to do that, however. In late October 2012, he informed his employers that he might be the subject of some imminent news stories; he was fired shortly after notifying the OLC. 

Ohio-based company sues Nintendo for intellectual property rights

Intellectual property refers to creations of the mind, including trademarks and patents. When a business owner in Ohio creates a new product, they are sometimes granted intellectual property rights on that product. This protects their business from unfair competition and keeps other potential businesses from stealing their product. In some cases, however, it can be difficult to prove intellectual property rights.

In 2006, Nintendo began to sell its popular Wii system, but an Ohio-based company, called Motiva, claims that Nintendo infringed on its patent for motion sensor technology. Motiva, started in 2003, wanted to use motion sensing technology to combine video gaming with physical fitness and subsequently sued Nintendo Co. for violation of its intellectual property rights. The lawsuit was filed in 2008 but it was then delayed for various reasons. 

Ohio-based class-action suit against Fannie Mae settles for $153M

When a large group of people come together to file a single lawsuit against a defendant it is known as a class-action lawsuit. These types of lawsuits can be extremely lengthy and costly for businesses to deal with. Often, business litigation ends in a settlement agreement; this allows the plaintiffs and the defendants to move on with their lives.

The Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and the State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio were the lead plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit filed several years ago against Fannie Mae and the company’s former auditor, KMPG LLP. The class-action lawsuit revolved around claims that the company issued disingenuous financial reports in the early 2000s; the company reportedly inflated its profits by as much as $6.3 billion.

Nike accused of intellectual property infringement

Trademarks are an extremely valuable marketing tool in Ohio. Trademarks are used to remind potential customers of a specific brand; when a customer sees a logo or hears a phrase, they will think of the company behind that trademark. Due to the powerful nature of trademarks, things can get messy when one company tries to infringe on the intellectual property rights of a rival company.

This year, Nike launched a “Make It Count” marketing campaign that included the use of the phrase “I Will.” As a result, Nike is now the target of a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by rival sportswear company Under Armour Inc. Nike has filed a response with the court saying that Under Armour does not have exclusive rights to the phrase “I Will.” Nike is arguing that the phrase “I Will” does not have the same trademark value because it does not automatically make consumers think of Under Armour. Nike claims that they have used the phrase in question for almost twenty years and that other companies have also used the phrase in their marketing campaigns.

Subscribe to This Blog's Feed

Contact Our Attorneys:

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Visit Our Business & Commercial Litigation Website
FindLaw Network

James E. Arnold & Associates, LPA
115 W. Main St. | Fourth Floor | Columbus, OH 43215 | Local: 614-600-2882 | Toll Free: 800-777-7574 | Fax: 614-469-1066 | Map & Directions